分类:捕鱼策略

来自Big Physics
Jinshanw讨论 | 贡献2019年4月28日 (日) 14:37的版本


Conover, D. O. (2002). Sustaining Fisheries Yields Over Evolutionary Time Scales. Science, 297(5578), 94-96. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1074085

Abstract

Fishery management plans ignore the potential for evolutionary change in harvestable biomass. We subjected populations of an exploited fish (Menidia menidia) to large, small, or random size-selective harvest of adults over four generations. Harvested biomass evolved rapidly in directions counter to the size-dependent force of fishing mortality. Large-harvested populations initially produced the highest catch but quickly evolved a lower yield than controls. Small-harvested populations did the reverse. These shifts were caused by selection of genotypes with slower or faster rates of growth. Management tools that preserve natural genetic variation are necessary for long-term sustainable yield.

总结和评论

下一步工作

参考文献

<references> [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11]

  1. Aramayo, V. (2015). Lower selectivity can help heavily exploited fish populations. Fisheries Research, 172, 261–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2015.07.028
  2. Breen, M., Graham, N., Pol, M., He, P., Reid, D., & Suuronen, P. (2016). Selective fishing and balanced harvesting. Fisheries Research, 184, 2-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2016.03.014
  3. Bunwong, K., & Sae-jie, W. (2017). Evolutionary consequences of age-specific harvesting: age at first reproduction. Advances in Difference Equations, 2017(1), 157. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-017-1214-2
  4. Conover, D. O. (2002). Sustaining Fisheries Yields Over Evolutionary Time Scales. Science, 297(5578), 94–96. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1074085
  5. Froese, R., Walters, C., Pauly, D., Winker, H., Weyl, O. L. F., Demirel, N., … Holt, S. J. (2016). A critique of the balanced harvesting approach to fishing. ICES Journal of Marine Science: Journal Du Conseil, 73(6), 1640–1650. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsv122
  6. Gwinn, D. C., Allen, M. S., Johnston, F. D., Brown, P., Todd, C. R., & Arlinghaus, R. (2015). Rethinking length-based fisheries regulations: the value of protecting old and large fish with harvest slots. Fish and Fisheries, 16(2), 259–281. https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12053
  7. Jana, D., Agrawal, R., Upadhyay, R. K., & Samanta, G. P. (2016). Ecological dynamics of age selective harvesting of fish population: Maximum sustainable yield and its control strategy. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 93, 111–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2016.09.021
  8. Kolding, J., Law, R., Plank, M., & van Zwieten, P. A. M. (2015). The optimal fishing pattern. 收入 J. F. Craig (编), Freshwater Fisheries Ecology (页 524–540). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118394380.ch41
  9. Law, R., & Plank, M. J. (2018). Balanced harvesting could reduce fisheries-induced evolution. Fish and Fisheries, 19(6), 1078–1091. https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12313
  10. Morbey, Y. E., & Mema, M. (2018). Size-selective fishing and the potential for fisheries-induced evolution in lake whitefish. Evolutionary Applications, 11(8), 1412–1424. https://doi.org/10.1111/eva.12635
  11. Uusi-Heikkilä, S., Whiteley, A. R., Kuparinen, A., Matsumura, S., Venturelli, P. A., Wolter, C., … Arlinghaus, R. (2015). The evolutionary legacy of size-selective harvesting extends from genes to populations. Evolutionary Applications, 8(6), 597-620. https://doi.org/10.1111/eva.12268

本分类目前不含有任何页面或媒体文件。